Pocket Kama

Pocket Kama 1.0

Improve your sex life with the Kama Sutra!

Pocket Kama is a strictly adults-only, Flash-based program which allows you to see, in detail, more than 20 positions from the famous Kama Sutra. View full description

PROS

  • Images and text make positions very clear

CONS

  • Poor interface
  • Strictly adults-only!

Not bad
5

Pocket Kama is a strictly adults-only, Flash-based program which allows you to see, in detail, more than 20 positions from the famous Kama Sutra.

If you're looking to liven up your sex life a little, this app will certainly give you the knowledge to do this. It features multiple positions illustrated with real images and explained in text, so you can see exactly what goes where. For this very reason, this is one to keep away from the children because, while it's not exactly pornographic, Pocket Kama is certainly pretty explicit.

As far as using the program goes, you'll need Flash installed on your Windows Mobile device to run it. You either flick through the positions using the arrow button, or browse through the list of positions and click the name to open the picture. Clicking on a picture reveals a written description of how to do it.

The positions are well explained but I felt the presentation values in Pocket Kama weren't particularly high. The interface is badly designed and the image quality isn't amazing when viewed on larger screen resolutions.

Nevertheless, if you're interested in trying out the Kama Stutra, this download is certainly an eye-opener.

Pocket Kama

Download

Pocket Kama 1.0

User reviews about Pocket Kama

  • TaZeo88@

    by TaZeo88@

    "Great for a little "on the road" surprise for my husband & I"

    I know I caught my husband off guard by having this on my netbook, but he was very excited, and very glad for the ins...   More.

  • *tom

    by *tom

    "Download link updated"

    Hi, The link has now been updated. Thanks for your comment..   More.

  • JediKnut

    by JediKnut

    "DEAD LINK!"

    Can't download. Dead link. Source link seems to be wrong as well.   More.